THE MALET STREET GAZETTE

EST. 1998

1858-2008

University of London External Programme 150th Birthday Events

Editor

Barrister Desk

MSG Past Articles

Book Reviews

Contact MSG

Home

 

Earn Your University of London LL.B Degree Online with ICLS

 

 

Report on sitting for the NC Bar

Posted on March 20, 2002 at 08:54:18 AM by Dale Wagstaff


George,

It would be great if you could report to us regarding sitting for the NC Bar. What was the Bar exam like, how is it set up, what type of preparation was required to prepare for it, what weaknesses or strengths did you feel you possessed in the conversion of the UOL degree/LLM Widener degree into knowledge necessary for the Bar, etc.. Also, did you discover any preparatory materials ie practice Bar exams that you could use in preparation for the exam. Upon passing the Bar, what will your intention then be? This information would be quite interesting and helpful to us who look forward to attaining what you have achieved.

Dale

Posted on March 24, 2002 at 10:01:01 AM by George Pappas

Hi Dale,

Thanks for your excellent question.

The North Carolina Bar permits holders of an ABA LL.M to take their bar exam provided you meet their character and fitness standards. For those who hold an LL.B from the University of London – whether earned internally or externally – you can consider taking the North Carolina Bar if you also earn a US LL.M degree from an American Bar Association approved law school.

The North Carolina Bar is set up into two parts. Part I is composed of 12 essays. The essay pool is actually composed of around 18 subjects from Agency, Contracts, US Constitutional law, NC Civil Procedure, NC Family Law, NC Ethics, Criminal Law, Evidence, Property, Corporation Law, Wills, Trusts and more.

It is important to get used to the idea that you cannot specialize in one or two areas – you must be proficient in ALL areas of the law. This is why the University of London standard is so helpful, because unlike many other British University LL.B degree programs, the London program is based on passing all of the subjects in a given year. The NC bar, unlike any of your LL.B degree programs, requires you to know 12 subjects in one day!

Part II of the NC Bar consists of the Multistate Bar Examination. The MBE is composed of 200 multiple choice questions in six core subjects. Evidence, Contracts, Constitutional Law, Property, Evidence, and Criminal Law/Procedure. Both the morning sessions and afternoon sessions are three hours.

The British LL.B, including the London LL.B, does not adequately prepare you to take the bar exam for several reasons. Firstly, the LL.B programs from England, while of a high standard, do not provide tuition in US Constitutional law, US Professional Responsibility, US Criminal Criminal Procedure, US Civil Procedure, US Rules of Evidence. Couple this with the fact that many states have state laws you must learn to pass the bar. For this reason, it is not enough to simply expect that an LL.B is going to prepare you for any US bar examination. You will need to invest money, time and effort to learn US law such that you can pass a bar exam.

Bar Review: Bar Review courses such as BarBri and MicroMash are essential to passing a bar. From my own experience, I found the MicroMash far better than BarBri for preparing for the NC essays. BarBri overloads you with so much law that it is difficult to absorb, much less apply. MicroMash on the other hand, provides essay questions, and suggested solutions together with a Lawyer Mentor who grades your essay work. From my experience, MicroMash wins hands down. The downside with MicroMash is that it does not cover all US jurisdictions; therefore, you must check to see that the jurisdiction you seek is covered by them. In short, I can’t see how you can pass a bar exam in the US without a bar review course.

While the LL.M I earned from Widener University School of Law in Corporate Finance & Law gave me the necessary prerequisite to take the NC bar, it also gave me experience and exposure to US law. In my view the LL.M is a necessary and needed stage in the US for LL.B graduates. Why? Because it helps to bridge many of the gaps left open by the LL.B. For example, I took Professional Responsibility, Contracts, Corporate law and other subjects at Widener that made US law feel at home. My LL.M helped a great deal.

Upon passing the bar, I intend to help the LL.B community. That’s right, I consider it an obligation by those of us who have struggled without e-mail, websites and help to guide current and future students in the best way to make the transition into the legal profession. For my part, I will specialize in the US since that is my home jurisdiction. I also plan to practice law in NC in the very near future. I expect to re-locate to NC in the next 60-90 days. My efforts will also be help LL.B students with the finest tutorial education available. Currently, I am appalled by the high cost of “some” tutorial services based in the UK and New York– quite frankly, you deserve better value for your tutorial lessons. That’s just for starters.

George Pappas
The Malet Street Gazette, Inc.

Posted on March 24, 2002 at 12:04:07 AM by Dale Wagstaff

George,

Thanks for your answer.

When applying for the LLM, do you know if there is there any requirement to have any other degree other than the LLB i.e. four year pre-requisite undergrad degree?

Also, did you have to wait the additional year, as Susan T will have to in Canada, in order to get accepted, due to the delay in getting your last years' marks of the LLB? If so, is there any way, if a person started with the LLM application process early enough, that the law school would review all information you could submit to date, without the final piece, and therefore, when you did submit the final year grades, they could conceivably make their decision in time to allow you to start that current year, instead of waiting another full year?

I have been in touch with Duke University as well as Emory University. Each of these universities now claim to have an LLM program specifically designed for international students, and I am seeing this more and more with other law schools. What I found interesting is that they appear to let you take core subjects within the LLM, which would greatly assist us in becoming familiar with US cases, as well as differences in legal terms. They also insist on a legal writing course as well, which I think would be a must. However, some of them speak in terms of "foreign students who have already received their law degrees from their mother country", and this makes me wonder what their position may be with me.

I had an earlier experience with University of Washington at St Louis, who also has a keen thrust towards soliciting international students for their LLM, in fact, has quite a focused marketing campaign concerning it. In testing their waters, they finally determined that I would not be eligible for their program, as I truly was not an international student, because I lived here in the US and always have. When I questioned them further, they seemed to indicate that their thought may have changed on that (was it when I suggested a possibility of discrimination?) and stated that the reason appeared to be based upon the "external" nature of my LLB degree. I didn't pursue it any farther than that, as I was in no position to accept if they did finally see it my way. But I do believe that their position would be a debatable one legally, and worthy of further investigation.

I also believe that seeking an internship would be extremely helpful in familiarizing ourselves with procedure here in the US. I have discussed with Brian Risman the possibility of writing an article on that topic, as I progress with my own findings, as I think this may be key to assisting our entrance within our own local legal communities. It is clear that we all will have to employ some shrewd marketing strategies to get us to where we want to be in legal practice. I have developed a plan which I believe will work, and am willing to share with others once I prove it does.

Thanks again for your answer.

Dale


Posted on March 24, 2002 at 03:56:15 PM by George Pappas


Dale

When applying for the LLM, do you know if there is there any requirement to have any other degree other than the LLB i.e. four year pre-requisite undergrad degree?

That’s a good question. For purposes of entering the legal profession in the US, you are required to have both an undergraduate degree plus your J.D. Note, the LL.B is a first degree, not a post graduate degree. In order to enter law school in the US for a J.D., you must first have an undergraduate degree. It is not clear what the LL.M admission rule is; however, at Widener, I had to also evidence my pre-law degree. You should check with the admission rules for your Specific University.

Also, did you have to wait the additional year, as Susan T will have to in Canada, in order to get accepted, due to the delay in getting your last years' marks of the LLB? If so, is there any way, if a person started with the LLM application process early enough, that the law school would review all information you could submit to date, without the final piece, and therefore, when you did submit the final year grades, they could conceivably make their decision in time to allow you to start that current year, instead of waiting another full year?

No. You don’t have to wait until you finish your LL.B in order to apply. You can be accepted by your US law school subject to completing your degree. Of course, you must submit your undergraduate and LL.B grades earned to date in order for the US law school to start the evaluation. Again, I doubt whether you can be accepted into the LL.M program without an undergraduate degree – the LL.B alone is not enough.

I have been in touch with Duke University as well as Emory University. Each of these universities now claim to have an LLM program specifically designed for international students, and I am seeing this more and more with other law schools. What I found interesting is that they appear to let you take core subjects within the LLM, which would greatly assist us in becoming familiar with US cases, as well as differences in legal terms. They also insist on a legal writing course as well, which I think would be a must. However, some of them speak in terms of "foreign students who have already received their law degrees from their mother country", and this makes me wonder what their position may be with me.

I find it appalling that some US law schools will only permit foreign students with the same degree to apply for their LL.M programs and not permit US citizens to apply. That’s an equal protection 14th Amendment violation in my book.

Yes, many ABA LL.M programs are flexible enough to let you take JD courses. Some LL.M programs are actually geared toward introducing US law to foreign law graduates. For students who wish to practice in the US, this is a must. You must learn US Constitutional law, US Civil Procedure, US Professional Responsibility, and of course, US legal writing. The LL.B’s offered from England do not offer these courses, and it is a serious omission which much be rectified. Other LL.M programs are focused on core areas like taxation, corporate law, etc. Even in these core LL.M areas, you must understand US constitutional law, contract, civil procedure and legal writing.

However, some of them speak in terms of "foreign students who have already received their law degrees from their mother country", and this makes me wonder what their position may be with me.

LL.M applicants who are US citizens with LL.B’s from the UK are rare; therefore, the LL.M admission rules in place with most US ABA LL.M programs are geared toward non-US foreign law graduates. Don’t get hung up with this issue, just apply to your school, and let them come back to you with any questions otherwise, you will muddle the process and perhaps make more life complicated for yourself.







 

View news headlines at MSNBC

     The Malet Street Gazette, Inc. is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice, and no one should rely on the information contained in the Gazette. The views and posts published on this website and the Malet Street Gazette Discussion Board are not expressions of the Gazette's management or editorial policy and do not necessarily reflect the Gazette's opinion. The Malet Street Gazette, Inc. accepts no responsiblity for the accuracy of any statement made herein, and all readers/visitors are advised to check the facts for themselves and not rely on statements made herein.  The authors and publishers accept no liability in relation thereto. The areas of law discussed are particularly fast-moving, and legal issues develop on a daily basis. The up-to-date position should always therefore be checked. The Malet Street Gazette is not connected nor officially sanctioned by the University of London.

Copyright©1998-2008 The Malet Street Gazette, Inc.